U.S. Charges Qualcomm with Antitrust Violations
Qualcomm was charged with antitrust violations by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission this week. The charge: That the leading maker of mobile chipsets uses anti-competitive practices to illegally maintain its monopoly.
“The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint in federal district court charging Qualcomm Inc. with using anticompetitive tactics to maintain its monopoly in the supply of a key semiconductor device used in cell phones and other consumer products,” the FTC complaint reads.
Qualcomm microprocessors power the majority of mobile devices sold around the world. But the FTC isn’t about microprocessors, it’s about the baseband processors that mobile devices used to communicate with cellular networks. Qualcomm’s baseband processors are so popular and so common that they’re even used by rivals, such as Apple, which do not use that firm’s microprocessors.
Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager
Devolutions RDM centralizes all remote connections on a single platform that is securely shared between users and across the entire team. With support for hundreds of integrated technologies — including multiple protocols and VPNs — along with built-in enterprise-grade password management tools, global and granular-level access controls, and robust mobile apps to complement desktop clients.
The FTC complaint alleges the following:
Qualcomm illegally strong-arms its partners into pay elevated licensing fees. The chipmaker has a “no license, no chips” policy that forces partners to license its chips at higher fees when they use other companies’ baseband processors. The more Qualcomm parts you use, the more you save, a policy that obviously harms competition and prevents device makers from choosing the best parts.
Qualcomm illegally withholds standards-essential patents from competitors. Despite a public commitment to license its standard-essential patents under “Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory” (FRAND) terms, Qualcomm simply refuses to license those patents to companies it perceives as competitors. (FRAND licensing of standard-essential patents is not actually required by law, to my understanding. But when FRAND terms cannot be reached, patent holders “may have to establish reasonable royalties in court,” the FTC says.)
Qualcomm illegally sought and obtained an exclusive contract with Apple. Qualcomm prevented Apple from seeking a second supplier of baseband processors in its iPhone and other i-devices from 2011 to 2016. (In 2016, Apple began offering an Intel part in certain iPhone models.) “Qualcomm recognized that any competitor that won Apple’s business would become stronger, and used exclusivity to prevent Apple from working with and improving the effectiveness of Qualcomm’s competitors,” the FTC notes.
“The FTC is seeking a court order to undo and prevent Qualcomm’s unfair methods of competition in violation of the FTC Act,” the FTC complaint notes. “The FTC has asked the court to order Qualcomm to cease its anticompetitive conduct and take actions to restore competitive conditions.”
Qualcomm lacks the broad recognition of chip giant Intel or other industry players. But its growing prominence in mobile, which has eclipsed the rest of the personal computing industry, has clearly triggered closer scrutiny by regulators. That said, it’s unclear how the FTC became aware of Qualcomm’s business practices. And whether Apple—the only Qualcomm partner mentioned in the complaint—tipped off the agency.