I need to build a system that will include 2 physical 2008 and 2 Hyper-V servers (with 4 virtual 2008 servers). Physical servers will carry SQL and must provide failover.
My idea is to use 1 iSCSI shared storage for 2 physical and 4 virtual servers.
Please see my scenario and correct if it is not valid.
A) On iSCSI storage I plan to create 2 LUNs – one for 2 physical servers and one for 2 hypervisor nodes
B) I want to place 2 physical servers 2008 R2 in cluster for SQL failover and load balancing.
I don’t have an experience with physical cluster but have an experience with Cluster Shared Volume in Hyper-V and tested HA. So, I need a confirmation that 2 physical servers 2008 r2 is an appropriate solution for the above requirement.
How physical servers should be configured?
2008 r2 on each server local drives and SQL DB on shared storage?
I am planning to go with HP DL360 G7 for servers and HP Storage Works 2000 for iSCSI or possibly SAS interface.
The goal of the shared storage in my case is to provide Clustering with failover and load balancing for physical servers and CSV for Hyper-V hosts.
I will appreciate corrections and suggestions …
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Create a free account today to participate in forum conversations, comment on posts and more.